We are given summary data for two groups: pet owners (group 1) and non-owners (group 2). We want to test the claim that the average stress level is lower for pet owners than for non-owners at a significance level of 0.05. We are given $\bar{X_1} = 15.25$, $\bar{X_2} = 21.95$, $s_1 = 3.00$, $s_2 = 4.10$, $n_1 = 27$, and $n_2 = 20$.
Probability and StatisticsHypothesis TestingT-testStatistical SignificanceOne-tailed testDegrees of Freedom
2025/4/23
1. Problem Description
We are given summary data for two groups: pet owners (group 1) and non-owners (group 2). We want to test the claim that the average stress level is lower for pet owners than for non-owners at a significance level of 0.
0
5. We are given $\bar{X_1} = 15.25$, $\bar{X_2} = 21.95$, $s_1 = 3.00$, $s_2 = 4.10$, $n_1 = 27$, and $n_2 = 20$.
2. Solution Steps
We will perform a one-tailed t-test.
First, we set up the null and alternative hypotheses:
(The average stress level of pet owners is equal to the average stress level of non-owners)
(The average stress level of pet owners is lower than the average stress level of non-owners)
Next, we calculate the t-statistic:
Since we are testing if , we assume under the null hypothesis. Thus:
Plugging in the given values:
Next, we calculate the degrees of freedom:
We take the smaller of and , so we use as a more conservative estimate. The approximation of 33.19 is closer to 19 than to 26, so we will round down to . Using a t-table with and a significance level of for a one-tailed test, we find the critical t-value to be .
Since our calculated t-statistic, , is less than the critical t-value, , we reject the null hypothesis.
3. Final Answer
Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the average stress level of pet owners is lower than the average stress level of non-owners at the 0.05 significance level.