We are given summary data for two groups: pet owners (group 1) and non-owners (group 2). We want to test the claim that the average stress level is lower for pet owners than for non-owners at a significance level of 0.05. We are given $\bar{X_1} = 15.25$, $\bar{X_2} = 21.95$, $s_1 = 3.00$, $s_2 = 4.10$, $n_1 = 27$, and $n_2 = 20$.

Probability and StatisticsHypothesis TestingT-testStatistical SignificanceOne-tailed testDegrees of Freedom
2025/4/23

1. Problem Description

We are given summary data for two groups: pet owners (group 1) and non-owners (group 2). We want to test the claim that the average stress level is lower for pet owners than for non-owners at a significance level of 0.
0

5. We are given $\bar{X_1} = 15.25$, $\bar{X_2} = 21.95$, $s_1 = 3.00$, $s_2 = 4.10$, $n_1 = 27$, and $n_2 = 20$.

2. Solution Steps

We will perform a one-tailed t-test.
First, we set up the null and alternative hypotheses:
H0:μ1=μ2H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 (The average stress level of pet owners is equal to the average stress level of non-owners)
H1:μ1<μ2H_1: \mu_1 < \mu_2 (The average stress level of pet owners is lower than the average stress level of non-owners)
Next, we calculate the t-statistic:
t=(X1ˉX2ˉ)(μ1μ2)s12n1+s22n2t = \frac{(\bar{X_1} - \bar{X_2}) - (\mu_1 - \mu_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}
Since we are testing if μ1<μ2\mu_1 < \mu_2, we assume μ1μ2=0\mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 under the null hypothesis. Thus:
t=X1ˉX2ˉs12n1+s22n2t = \frac{\bar{X_1} - \bar{X_2}}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}
Plugging in the given values:
t=15.2521.953.00227+4.10220=6.7927+16.8120=6.713+0.8405=6.70.3333+0.8405=6.71.1738=6.71.0834=6.184t = \frac{15.25 - 21.95}{\sqrt{\frac{3.00^2}{27} + \frac{4.10^2}{20}}} = \frac{-6.7}{\sqrt{\frac{9}{27} + \frac{16.81}{20}}} = \frac{-6.7}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{3} + 0.8405}} = \frac{-6.7}{\sqrt{0.3333 + 0.8405}} = \frac{-6.7}{\sqrt{1.1738}} = \frac{-6.7}{1.0834} = -6.184
Next, we calculate the degrees of freedom:
df=(s12n1+s22n2)2(s12n1)2n11+(s22n2)2n21df = \frac{(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2})^2}{\frac{(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1})^2}{n_1 - 1} + \frac{(\frac{s_2^2}{n_2})^2}{n_2 - 1}}
df=(3227+4.1220)2(3227)2271+(4.1220)2201=(927+16.8120)2(13)226+(0.8405)219=(0.3333+0.8405)20.111126+0.706519=(1.1738)20.0043+0.0372=1.37780.0415=33.19df = \frac{(\frac{3^2}{27} + \frac{4.1^2}{20})^2}{\frac{(\frac{3^2}{27})^2}{27 - 1} + \frac{(\frac{4.1^2}{20})^2}{20 - 1}} = \frac{(\frac{9}{27} + \frac{16.81}{20})^2}{\frac{(\frac{1}{3})^2}{26} + \frac{(0.8405)^2}{19}} = \frac{(0.3333 + 0.8405)^2}{\frac{0.1111}{26} + \frac{0.7065}{19}} = \frac{(1.1738)^2}{0.0043 + 0.0372} = \frac{1.3778}{0.0415} = 33.19
We take the smaller of n11=26n_1 - 1 = 26 and n21=19n_2 - 1 = 19, so we use df=19df = 19 as a more conservative estimate. The approximation of 33.19 is closer to 19 than to 26, so we will round down to df=19df = 19. Using a t-table with df=19df = 19 and a significance level of α=0.05\alpha = 0.05 for a one-tailed test, we find the critical t-value to be tcritical=1.729t_{critical} = -1.729.
Since our calculated t-statistic, t=6.184t = -6.184, is less than the critical t-value, tcritical=1.729t_{critical} = -1.729, we reject the null hypothesis.

3. Final Answer

Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the average stress level of pet owners is lower than the average stress level of non-owners at the 0.05 significance level.

Related problems in "Probability and Statistics"

The problem provides a frequency distribution table of marks obtained by students. Part (a) requires...

ProbabilityConditional ProbabilityWithout ReplacementCombinations
2025/6/5

The problem is divided into two questions, question 10 and question 11. Question 10 is about the fre...

Frequency DistributionCumulative FrequencyOgivePercentileProbabilityConditional ProbabilityCombinations
2025/6/5

A number is selected at random from the integers 30 to 48 inclusive. We want to find the probability...

ProbabilityPrime NumbersDivisibility
2025/6/3

The problem describes a survey where 30 people answered about their favorite book genres. The result...

PercentagesData InterpretationPie ChartFractions
2025/6/1

The problem asks us to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in promotion rat...

Hypothesis TestingChi-Square TestContingency TableStatistical SignificanceIndependence
2025/6/1

We are given a contingency table showing the number of students from different majors (Psychology, B...

Chi-Square TestContingency TableStatistical InferenceHypothesis Testing
2025/6/1

The problem describes a scenario where a pizza company wants to determine if the number of different...

Chi-Square TestGoodness-of-Fit TestHypothesis TestingFrequency DistributionP-value
2025/6/1

The problem asks to test the significance of three chi-square tests given the sample size $N$, numbe...

Chi-square testStatistical SignificanceDegrees of FreedomEffect SizeCramer's VHypothesis Testing
2025/5/29

The problem asks us to compute the expected frequencies for the given contingency table. The conting...

Contingency TableExpected FrequenciesChi-squared Test
2025/5/29

The problem asks us to estimate the chi-square value when $n=23$ and $p=99$, given a table of chi-sq...

Chi-square distributionStatistical estimationInterpolation
2025/5/27