The question asks which of the statements about the dividend constant-growth model are correct. The statements are: I. Assumes that dividends increase at a constant rate forever. II. Can be used to compute a stock price at any point in time. III. Can be used to value zero-growth stocks. IV. Requires the growth rate to be less than the required return.

Applied MathematicsFinancial MathematicsStock ValuationDividend Discount ModelGordon Growth ModelPresent Value
2025/7/8

1. Problem Description

The question asks which of the statements about the dividend constant-growth model are correct. The statements are:
I. Assumes that dividends increase at a constant rate forever.
II. Can be used to compute a stock price at any point in time.
III. Can be used to value zero-growth stocks.
IV. Requires the growth rate to be less than the required return.

2. Solution Steps

The dividend constant-growth model, also known as the Gordon Growth Model, is used to determine the intrinsic value of a stock, based on a future series of dividends that grow at a constant rate. The formula is:
P0=D1rgP_0 = \frac{D_1}{r - g}
where:
P0P_0 is the current stock price,
D1D_1 is the expected dividend per share one year from now,
rr is the required rate of return for equity investors, and
gg is the constant growth rate of dividends, forever.
Statement I: The model explicitly assumes that dividends increase at a constant rate forever. So, statement I is correct.
Statement II: The formula computes the present value of all future dividends. It can be used to determine the stock price at the present time (time 0). It isn't directly used to compute a stock price at any point in time (e.g., time 1, 2, etc.). So statement II is incorrect.
Statement III: A zero-growth stock implies g=0g=0. If we set g=0g=0 in the formula, we have P0=D1rP_0 = \frac{D_1}{r}, which is valid. Therefore, the constant growth model can be used to value zero-growth stocks. So, statement III is correct.
Statement IV: The formula is valid only when r>gr > g. If grg \ge r, the denominator becomes zero or negative, resulting in an undefined or negative stock price, which is not economically meaningful. So, statement IV is correct.
Since statements I, III, and IV are correct, the answer is c.

3. Final Answer

c. I, III, and IV only

Related problems in "Applied Mathematics"

A cylindrical container with small holes drilled vertically is filled with water, as shown in the fi...

Fluid DynamicsBernoulli's PrinciplePhysicsVelocityProjectile MotionDimensional Analysis
2025/7/22

The problem describes a scenario involving a container with water jets emanating from it at differen...

Fluid DynamicsTorricelli's TheoremProjectile MotionOptimizationPhysics
2025/7/22

A cylindrical tank has small holes drilled vertically along its side, as shown in the diagram. The t...

Fluid DynamicsBernoulli's EquationHydrostaticsPhysicsDimensional Analysis
2025/7/22

The problem is to solve the partial differential equation: $\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + \fra...

Partial Differential EquationsLaplace's EquationSeparation of VariablesBoundary ConditionsCalculus
2025/7/22

The problem requires using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) to solve for different variables i...

FinanceCAPMFormula ApplicationPercentage Calculation
2025/7/22

Jamie Wong is building an investment portfolio containing two stocks: Stock L and Stock M. Stock L w...

Portfolio ManagementWeighted AverageFinancial ModelingPercentage Calculation
2025/7/22

The problem asks us to fill in the blanks with either $g$ (grams) or $kg$ (kilograms) to make the st...

Units of MeasurementWeightConversion
2025/7/17

Warda walks at an average speed of 3 km/hr for 45 minutes before running for half an hour at a certa...

Word ProblemDistanceSpeedTimeRateLinear Equations
2025/7/16

Determine the vertical displacement at the point $I$ of the given structure, due to the effect of th...

Structural AnalysisDeflectionBeam TheoryVirtual WorkEngineering Mechanics
2025/7/16

The problem asks to determine the vertical displacement at point I (which I assume is at the top of ...

Structural MechanicsCastigliano's TheoremBeam BendingStrain EnergyDeflectionIntegration
2025/7/16